Research, biographical choice and the writing of history: biographying the duke of Caxias

Authors

  • Adriana Barreto de Souza Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v0i9.401

Keywords:

Biography, Experience, History writing

Abstract

In this article, I intend to work with the concept of experience and its links with the production of knowledge in history, based on a reflection on the course, the choices and the methodological interventions I had to make while writing a biographical thesis, and also on the experiences I have lived during my researches. Through a close dialogue with Reinhart Koselleck and an Italian historiographical tradition based on micro-history, I intend to reflect on two sets of issues that shaped the research. The first is the political and historical importance of the memory in which I intended to interfere with: the memory of the Duke of Caxias. The other is more theoretical, about writing a thesis in history based on the uniqueness of a character’s life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Adriana Barreto de Souza, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro

Professora adjunta do Departamento de História e do Programa de Pós-graduação em História da UFRRJ. Autora dos livros: Duque de Caxias: o homem por trás do monumento. RJ, Civilização Brasileira, 2008; e O Exército na consolidação do Império: um estudo histórico sobre a política militar conservadora. RJ, Arquivo Nacional, 1999 (Prêmio Arquivo Nacional de Pesquisa)

Published

2012-06-23

How to Cite

DE SOUZA, A. B. Research, biographical choice and the writing of history: biographying the duke of Caxias. História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography, Ouro Preto, v. 5, n. 9, p. 106–128, 2012. DOI: 10.15848/hh.v0i9.401. Disponível em: https://historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/401. Acesso em: 18 may. 2024.

Issue

Section

Dossier “History and biography: approaches, challenges and theoretical implications in the historiographical field”