Os sentidos do anacronismo

Bruno Gonçalves

doi:10.15848/hh.v15i38.1829

Autores/as

Bruno Gonçalves USP/Doutorando https://orcid.org/

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v15i38.1829

Palabras clave:

Anacronismo, Conceito de História, Teoria e História da Historiografia

Resumen

O objetivo deste balanço é sintetizar o que foi escrito nas últimas décadas sobre o conceito de anacronismo em diferentes campos do conhecimento. O panorama oferecido revela que o anacronismo compreende vários significados (dentre eles: atribuição conceitual, ferramenta heurística, tabu profissional e índice de consciência histórica) e que existem estratégias para lidar com ele (criação de tipologias e critérios de admissão, reafirmação do tabu, crítica radical, entre outras). Além disso, o conceito desempenha papel de grande importância nas disputas intelectuais, cuja reflexão oferece uma ocasião privilegiada para o exercício de poder sobre a historiografia. Conclui-se que o anacronismo é um conceito polissêmico, duradouro e polêmico, e que seu valor normativo parece comprometer o estudo de sua história.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

ARAVAMUDAN, Srinivas. The return of anachronism. Modern Language Quarterly, Durham, v. 64, n. 4, 2001. p. 331-354.

ARNOVICK, Leslie K. It’s a sign of times: uses of anachronism in medieval drama and postmodern novel. Studia Neophilologica, [s. l.], v. 65, n. 2, 1993. p. 157-168.

BARNES, Annette; BARNES, Jonathan. Time out of joint: some reflections on anachronism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Oxford, v. 47, n. 3, 1989. p. 253-261.

BARROS, José d’Assunção. Os conceitos na história: considerações sobre o anacronismo. Ler História, Lisboa, v. 71, 2017. p. 155-180.

BEVIR, Mark. Porque a distância histórica não é um problema. História da Historiografia, Ouro Preto, v. 18, 2015. p. 11-28.

BEVIR, Mark. When can we apply our concepts to the past? Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 282-287.

BLAAS, Piet B. M. Continuity and anachronism: parliamentary and constitutional development in whig historiography and in the anti-whig reaction between 1890 and 1930. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1978.

BLAAS, Piet B. M. Some general remarks after thirty years. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 332-336.

BRUSH, Stephen G. Anachronism and the History of Science: Copernicus as an airplane passenger. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 255-264.

BOWMAN, Matthew. Shapes of time: melancholia, anachronism, and de-distancing. In: BOETZKES, Amanda; VINEGAR, Aron (orgs.). Heidegger and the work of art history. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014. p. 173-194.

BURKE, Peter. A short history of distance. In: PHILLIPS, Mark S.; CAINE, Barbara; THOMAS, Julia Adeney (orgs). Rethinking historical distance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013a. p. 21-33.

BURKE, Peter. Exemplarity and anti-exemplarity in early modern Europe. In: LIANERI, A. (org.). The Western time of ancient history: historiographical encounters with the Greek and Roman pasts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 48-59.

BURKE, Peter. O conceito de anacronismo de Petrarca a Poussin. Política & Trabalho, João Pessoa, v. 39, 2013b. p. 195-220.

BURKE, Peter. The Renaissance sense of the past. London: Edward Arnold, 1969.

BURKE, Peter. Triumphs and poverties of anachronism. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 291-298.

CHAMPION, Matthew S. A fuller history of temporalities. Past and Present, Oxford, v. 243, 2019a. p. 255-266.

CHAMPION, Matthew S. The history of temporalities: an introduction. Past and Present, Oxford, v. 243, 2019b. p. 247-254.

CONDREN, Conal. A reflection on the problem of anachronism in intellectual history. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 288-293.

CONDREN, Conal. Political theory and the problem of anachronism. In: VINCENT, Andrew (org.). Political theory: tradition and diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. p. 45-66.

DASTON, Lorraine. The center cannot hold. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 231-236.

DIDI-HUBERMAN, Georges. A história da arte como disciplina anacrônica. Diante do tempo: história da arte e anacronismo das imagens. Tradução de Vera Casa Nova e Márcia Arbex. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2017. p. 15-68.

DOSSE, François. De l’usage raisonné de l’anachronisme. Espaces Temps, [s. l.], v. 87-88, 2005. p. 156-171.

DUCHEYNE, Steffen. Ascribing contemporary scientific concepts to past thinkers: towards a frame-work for handling matters more precisely. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 274-290.

EBELING, Herman. The word anachronism. Modern Language Notes, [Baltimore], v. 52, n. 2, 1937. p. 120-121.

FEBVRE, Lucien. O problema da incredulidade no século XVI: a religião de Rabelais. Tradução de Maria Lúcia Machado. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2009.

FISCHER, David Hackett. Historians’ fallacies: towards a logic of historical thought. New York: Harper Perennial, 1970.

FLORES, Maria Bernadete Ramos. Elogio ao anacronismo: para os andróginos de Ismael Nery. Topoi, Rio de Janeiro, v. 15, n. 29, 2014. p. 414-443.

FRYXELL, Allegra R.P. Time and the modern: current trends in the history of modern temporalities. Past and Present, Oxford, v. 243, 2019. p. 285-298.

GASKILL, Malcolm. Time’s arrows. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 237-252.

GINZBURG, Carlo. De A. Warburg a E.H. Gombrich: notas sobre um problema de método. In: GINZBURG, Carlo. Mitos, emblemas e sinais: morfologia e história. Tradução de Federico Carotti. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2007a. p. 41-93.

GINZBURG, Carlo. Sinais: raízes de um paradigma indiciário. In: GINZBURG, Carlo. Mitos, emblemas e sinais: morfologia e história. Tradução de Federico Carotti. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2007b. p. 143-179.

GINZBURG, Carlo. Our words, and theirs: a reflection on the historian’s craft, today. In: FELLMAN, S; RAHIKAINEN, M. (orgs.). Historical knowledge: in quest of theory, method and evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012. p. 97-119.

GRAZIA, Margreta de. Anachronism. In: CUMMINGS, Brian; SIMPSON, James. (org.) Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 13-32.

GREENE, Thomas M. Le texte vulnérable: essais sur la littérature de la Renaissance. Tradução de Max Vernet. Paris: Champion, 2002.

GREENE, Thomas M. Imitation and anachronism. Light in Troy: imitation and discovery in Renaissance poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982. p. 28-53.

HADDOCK, Adrian. Anachronism and the individuation of concepts. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 265-272.

HANß, Stefan. The fetish of accuracy: perspectives on early modern time(s). Past and Present, Oxford, v. 243, 2019. p. 267-284.

HOBSBAWM, Eric. Dentro e fora da história. Sobre história. Tradução de Cid Knipel Moreira. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1998. p. 13-21.

HUNT, Lynn. Against presentism. Perspectives on History: the newsmagazine of the American Historical Association, 2002. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2Qhb6RZ Acesso em: 10 de jul. de 2020.

JARDINE, Nick. Uses and abuses of anachronism in the history of the sciences. History of Science, [s. l.], v. 38, n. 3, 2000. p. 251-270.

KOSELLECK, Reinhardt. Futuro passado: contribuição à semântica dos tempos históricos. Tradução de Wilma Patrícia Maas e Carlos Almeida Pereira. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, Editora PUC Rio, 2006.

KOSELLECK, Reinhardt et al. O conceito de história. Tradução de René E. Gertz. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2016.

LANDWEHR, Achim; WINNERLING, Tobias. Chronisms: on the past and future of the relation of times. Rethinking History, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 4, 2019. p. 435-455.

LESLIE, Margaret. In defense of anachronism. Political Studies, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 4, 1970. p. 433-447.

LORAUX, Nicole. Elogio do anacronismo. In: NOVAES, Adauto. (org.) Tempo e história. São Paulo: Secretaria Municipal de Cultura, Companhia das Letras, 1992. p. 57-70.

LUZZI, Joseph. The rethoric of anachronism. Comparative Literature, Durham, v. 61, n. 1, 2009. p. 69-84.

LYNCH, William T. The utility of the present in reconstructing science’s past: historical counterfactuals and contemporary possibilities. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 241-250.

MALDONADO CHAVES, Maria Eugenia. El anacronismo en la historia: ¿error o possibilidad? A proposito de las reflexiones sobre el tiempo em Carlo Ginzburg, Marc Bloch y Georges Didi-Huberman. Historia y Sociedad, Medellin, v. 30, 2016. p. 45-73.

MITROVIC, Branko. Attribution of concepts and problems with anachronism. History and Theory, Middletown, v. 50, 2011. p. 303-327.

MOST, Glenn W. Anachronisms. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 294-297.

NAGEL, Alexander; WOOD, Christopher. Anachronic Renaissance. New York: Zone Books, 2010.

NAGEL, Alexander; WOOD, Christopher. Towards a new model of Renaissance anachronism. Art Bulletin, New York, v. 87, n. 3, 2005. p. 403-415.

OGLE, Vanessa. Time, temporality and the history of capitalism. Past and Present, Oxford, v. 243, 2019. p. 312-327.

OLDROYD, David. Anachronism and the ‘history wars’ in Australia. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 337-365.

OLIVEIRA, Gustavo Ponciano Cunha de. A tipologia do anacronismo em Borges. Remate dos Malês, Campinas, v. 36, n. 1, 2016. p. 219-237.

PALONEN, Kari. Reinhardt Koselleck on translation, anachronism and conceptual change. In: BURKE, Martin; RICHTER, Melvin. (org.) Why concepts matter: translating social and political thought. Leiden: Brill, 2012. p. 73-92.

PRUDOVSKY, Gad. Can we ascribe to past thinkers concepts they had no linguistic means to express? History and Theory, Middletown, v. 36, n. 1, 1997. p. 15-31.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques. O conceito de anacronismo e a verdade do historiador. In: SALOMON, Marlon (org.). História, verdade e tempo. Chapecó: Argos, 2011. p. 21-49.

ROOD, Tim; ATACK, Carol; PHILIPS, Tom. Anachronism and antiquity. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

RUBIN, Miri. Presentism’s useful anachronisms. Past and Present, Oxford, v. 234, 2017. p. 236-244.

SCHIFFMAN, Zachary Sayre. Renaissance. The birth of the past. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2011. p. 138-198.

SILVA OLARTE, Renán. Del anacronismo en Historia y en Ciencias Sociales. Historia Critica, Bogotá, 2009. p. 278-299.

ŠPELDA, Daniel. Anachronisms in the History of Science: an attempt at a typology. Almagest, Turnhout, v. 3, n. 2, 2012. p. 91-119.

SYRJÄMÄKI, Sami. Sins of a historian: perspectives on the problem of anachronism. 2011. Dissertação – School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finlândia, 2011.

SKINNER, Quentin. Meaning and understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory, [Middletown], v. 8, n. 1, 1969. p. 3-53.

SPOERHASE, Carlos. Zwischen den zeiten: anachronismus und präsentismus in der methologie der historischen wissenschaften. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 8, 2004. p. 169-240.

STOLL, Elmer Edgar. Anachronism in Shakespeare criticism. Modern Philology, [Chicago], v. 7, n. 4, 1910. p. 557-575.

STRAND, Daniel. A plea for anachronism. In: KÄLLÉN, Anna (org.). Making Cultural History: new perspectives on Western heritage. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, 2013. p. 141-150.

TAMBLING, Jeremy. On anachronism. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010.

TOLENTINO GARCIA, J. Adrán. La observación del anacronismo: uma llave para la ética historiadora. Historiografias, [Zaragoza], v. 14, 2017. p. 34-50.

TOSH, Nick. Anachronism and retrospective explanation: in defence of a present-centred history of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, [s. l.], v. 34, 2003. p. 647-659.

TUCKER, Aviezer. Temporal provincialism: anachronism, retrospection and evidence. Scientia Poetica, Berlin, v. 10, 2006. p. 299-317.

VOIGT, André Fabiano. Qual a importância de uma época: anacronismo e história. Anos 90, Porto Alegre, v. 24, n. 46, 2017. p. 23-44.