Postcolonial Apologies, Politics of Regret and Temporal Manichaeism: A Theoretical Analysis Through the Case of the Conquest of Mexico

Rodrigo Escribano Roca; Marcos Alonso Fernández

doi:10.15848/hh.v16i41.2039

Authors

Rodrigo Escribano Roca Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez
Marcos Alonso Universidad Complutense

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v16i41.2039

Keywords:

Presentism, Moral, Temporalities

Abstract

The article analyzes the forms of temporality and morality which operate in the request for postcolonial apologies in modern democracies, focusing on the Mexican case. There is already rich literature on the changing mnemonic and historiographical interpretations of the Conquest in Mexican history up to the present day. In this paper the Mexican case serves as factual support to discuss theoretically the modes of temporal consciousness that underlie postcolonial apologies and the moral relations to the past that these entail. We will examine the topic in light of the “ethical turn” proposals found in historical theory. We will critically address the assumptions regarding historicity behind the so-called “politics of regret,” questioning the ideological premises that frame the request for apologies and the decolonial theories that support them. Finally, we will approach the problem based on moral philosophy works that have studied collective apologies’ paradoxical nature. The questions to answer are: does retrospective recrimination of colonial processes make sense? Can we reclaim apologies from history? We conclude that the
postcolonial apologies demanded by President López Obrador depend on a mythologized vision of the past, which reproduces a logic of temporal Manichaeism, with a scant epistemological basis to judge historically the event that it condemns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marcos Alonso, Universidad Complutense

Universidad Complutense, Faculty of Medicine, Departament of Public Health, Madrid, Chile, Spain

References

ANDERSON, Warwick. Decolonizing Histories in Theory and Practice: An Introduction, History and Theory, Oxford, v. 59, n. 3, p. 369–375, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12164. Accessed in: January 15, 2020.

ASSMANN, Aleida. Towards a New Ethos of History? In: HELGESSON, Stefan; SVENUNGSSON, Jayne. The Ethos of History: Time and Responsibility. New York: Berghahn Books, 2018. p. 17–23.

BELL, Duncan. Agonistic Democracy and the Politics of Memory, Constellations, Cambridge/Boston, v. 15, n. 1, p. 148 – 166, 2008, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2008.00478.x. Accessed in: December 23, 2016.

BELL, Duncan. Memory, Trauma and World Politics: Reflections on the Relationship between Past and Present. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

BELVEDRESI, Rosa, ¿Hay una objetividad específica para la historia?, História da Historiografia, Ouro Preto, v. 13, n. 34, p. 201-29, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v13i34.1664 Accessed in: February 3, 2022.

BENIGNO, Francesco. Las palabras del tiempo: un ideario para pensar históricamente. Madrid: Cátedra, 2013.

BERNABÉ, Daniel. La trampa de la diversidad: cómo el neoliberalismo fragmentó la identidad de la clase trabajadora. Madrid: Akal, 2018.

BEVERNAGE, Berber. The Past Is Evil/Evil Is Past: On Retrospective Politics, Philosophy of History, and Temporal Manichaeism, History and Theory, Oxford, v. 54, n. 3, p. 342–347, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10763. Accessed in: December 18, 2016.

CARR, David. Experience and History: phenomenological perspectives on the Historical World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

CASTRO-GÓMEZ, Santiago. El tonto y los canallas: notas para un republicanismo transmoderno. Bogotá: Pontifica Universidad Javeriana, 2019.

CHARTIER, Roger. El pasado en el presente. Co-herencia, Medellín, v. 4, n. 7, p. 1-23, 2007. Available at: https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/co-herencia/article/view/316. Accessed in: November 1, 2016.

DAY, Mark. Our Relations with the Past. Philosophia, Storrs (Connecticut), v. 36, n.4, 2008, p. 417–27. Available at: https://philpapers.org/rec/DAYORW. Accessed in: January 13, 2017.

DAVID, Lea. The past can’t heal us: the dangers of mandating memory in the name of human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

DE BAETS, Antoon. Responsible History. New York: Berghahn Books, 2009.

DE BAETS, Antoon. Democracia y Escritura de la Historia, Historiografías: Revista de Historia y Teoría, Zaragoza, n. 9, 2015, p. 31-43. Available at: https://papiro.unizar.es/ojs/index.php/historiografias/article/view/2402. Accessed in: March 14, 2016.

DE BAETS, Antoon. The Impact of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on the Study of History, History and Theory, Oxford, v. 48, n. 1, 2009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2009.00483.x. Accessed in: July 4, 2016.

DUSSEL, Enrique; JÁUREGUI, Carlos; MORAÑA, Mabel. Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008.

ERKKILÄ, Ville. Time, Identity, and History: on the Cognitive Psychology and Figural Practice of Historiography. Rethinking History, London, v. 19, n. 4, p. 602–620, 2015. Av ailable at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2015.1030229 . Accessed in: April 3, 2017.

EVANS, Richard John. Altered Pasts: counterfactuals in History. Brandeis University Press: Jerusalem, 2013

FERNÁNDEZ SEBASTIÁN, Javier. Pasado irreversible, pasado irrevocable: de historia, anacronismos, crímenes, memoria y olvido. In: FERNÁNDEZ SEBASTIÁN, Javier. Tiempos de la Historia, Tiempos del Derecho. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2021. p. 106-113.

FERRO, Marc, L’histoire sous surveillance: science et conscience de l’histoire. Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1985.

FROEYMAN, Anton. History, Ethics and the Recognition of the Other: a levinasian view on the writing of History. London: Routledge, 2016.

FRYXELL, A. R. Time and the Modern: current trends in the History of Modern Temporalities, Past & Present, Oxford, v. 243, n. 1, 2019, p. 285–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtz012. Accessed in: January 15, 2020.

FUKUYAMA, Francis. Identidad: la demanda de dignidad y las políticas de resentimiento, Ediciones Deusto: Barcelona, 2019.

GASKELL, Ivan. Historical Distance, Historical Judgement. In: PHILLIPS, Mark; CAINE, Barbara; THOMAS, Julia. Rethinking Historical Distance. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013. p. 35-45.

GIGLIOLI, Daniele. Crítica de la víctima. Barcelona: Herder, 2017.

GONÇALVES, Bruno. Os sentidos do anacronismo. História da Historiografia, Ouro Preto, v. 15, n. 38, p. 285-314, 2002. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v15i38.1829. Accessed in: October 15, 2021.

GÓNZALEZ SALINAS, Omar Fabián. Historia, héroes y conmemoraciones como armas de lucha política: el culto a Miguel Hidalgo en tiempos de la intervención francesa en México. Anuario de historia regional y de las fronteras, Ciudad de México, v. 21, n. 2, p. 101–124, 2016. Available at: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=407545769005. Accessed in: April 4, 2017.

GUTHRIE, Caroline. Narratives of Rupture: Tarantino’s Counterfactual Histories and the American Historical Imaginary, Rethinking History, London, v. 23, n. 3, p. 339–361, 2019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2019.1615200. Accessed in: March 13, 2021.

HARTOG, François. Chronos: l’Occident aux prises avec le temps. Paris: Gallimard, 2020.

HARTOG, François. Regimes of Historicity: presentism and experiences of time. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.

HERNÁNDEZ REYNA, Miriam. Re-escribir la historia, re-imaginar el porvenir: sobre los usos políticos del pasado indígena en el México contemporáneo. In: ALCALÁ CAMPOS, Raúl. Los retos de la Filosofía por venir. México: UNAM, 2019, p.54-82.

HOBSBAWM, Eric J.; RANGER, Terence O. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

HUGHES-WARRINGTON, Marnie. If: counterfactual and conditional Historiography. History and Theory, Oxford, v. 58, n. 2, p. 268–283, 2019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12113. Accessed in: May 30, 2020.

ITESO, Universidad Jesuita de Guadalajara. Presentación Del Libro: La “Memoria Artificial”, 2019. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhJl5DAWK5o Accessed in: May 30, 2020.

JORDHEIM, Helge. Introduction: Multiple Times and the Work of Synchronization. History and Theory, Oxford, v. 53, n. 4, p. 498–518, 2014. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10728 Accessed in: November 12, 2016.

JORDHEIM, Helge. Return to Chronology. In: TAMM, Marek; OLIVIER, Laurent. Rethinking Historical Time: New Approaches to Presentism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. p. 43–56.

KALIL, Luis G.; FERNANDES, Luiz E. Narrando a Conquista: como a historiografia leu e interpretou os acontecimentos ocorridos no México entre 1519 e 1521. História da Historiografia, Ouro Preto, v. 12, n. 30, p. 71-103, 2019. DOI: 10.15848/hh.v12i30.1464. Disponível em: https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1464. Accessed in: September 3, 2022.

KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Repetitive Structures in Language and History. In: TILMANS, Karin; VAN VREE, Frank; WINTER, Jay. Performing the Past: memory, history, and identity in Modern Europe. Amsterdam; Manchester: Amsterdam University Press; Manchester University Press, 2010. p. 54–63.

KUUKKANEN, Jouni-Matti. Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

LEGRÁS, Horacio. Culture and Revolution: violence, memory, and the Making of Modern Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2017.

LEVY, Neil. The Apology Paradox and the Non-Identity Problem. The Philosophical Quarterly, Edinburgh, v. 52, n. 208, p. 358–68, 2002. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3543051. Accessed in: February 2, 2015.

LIPOVETSKY, Gilles. La era del vacío: ensayos sobre el individualismo contemporáneo. Ciudad de México, : Editorial Anagrama, 2015.

LÓPEZ OBRADOR, Andrés Manuel; GOBIERNO DE MÉXICO. “Carta de Andrés Manuel López Obrador al Papa Francisco, Jefe Del Estado Vaticano”. October 2, 2020, 2. Available at: https://es.scribd.com/document/479481233/Carta-de-AMLO-al-PapaFrancisco Accessed in: January 12, 2021.

LORENZ, Chris. Out of Time? Some Critical Reflections on François Hartog’s Presentism. In: TAMM, Marek; OLIVIER, Laurent. Rethinking Historical Time: new approaches to presentism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. p. 34–36.

MINDER, Raphael; MALKIN, Elisabeth. Mexican Call for Conquest Apology Ruffles Feathers in Spain and Mexico. The New York Times, March 27, 2019. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/27/world/americas/mexico-spain-apology.html Accessed in: January 12, 2021.

MIGNOLO, Walter. Local Histories/Global Designs: coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Chicheste: Princeton University Press, 2000.

MUDROVCIC, María Inés. Historical Narrative as a Moral Guide and the Present as History as an Ethical Project. História da Historiografia, Ouro Preto,v. 9, n. 21, p. 10-24, 2016,. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v0i21.1024. Accessed in: January 15, 2020.

MUNIZ DE ALBUQUERQUE JÚNIOR, Durval. A história tem juízo: o juiz e o inquérito como modelos de autoria e procedimento analítico na escrita historiográfica. História da Historiografia, Ouro Preto, v. 13, n. 34, p. 17-40, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v13i34.1623. Accessed in: December 5, 2020.

NAVAJAS ZUBELDÍA, Carlos. Sobre el tiempo histórico, Historiografías: revista de historia y teoría, Zaragoza, n. 5, p. 32–50, 2013. Available at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4531442. Accessed in: March 13, 2016.

NAVARRETE, Federico. 1521-2021, reflexiones sobre una conmemoración entre diferentes historias. In: AÑÓN, Valeria. 500 años de la conquista de México: resistencias y apropiaciones. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2022, p. 113-128.

NORA, Pierre. Les lieux de mémoire. Paris: Gallimard, 1997.

OLICK, Jeffrey K. The Politics of Regret: on collective Memory and Historical Responsibility. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2013.

PAUL, Herman. Relations to the Past: a research agenda for Historical Theorists. Rethinking History, London, v. 19, n. 3, p. 450–58, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2014.927615 Accessed in: February 27, 2016.

PÉREZ BAQUERO, Rafael. Memory, Narrative, and Conflict in Writing the Past: When. Historians Undergo Ethical and Political Strains. História da Historiografia, Ouro Preto, v. 13, n. 32, p. 47-81, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v13i32.1494. Accessed in: January 13, 2021.

PHILLIPS, Mark. Rethinking Historical Distance. In: PHILLIPS, Mark; CAINE, Barbara; THOMAS, Julia. Rethinking Historical Distance. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013. p. 1-20.

RANGEL, Marcelo de Mello; ARAUJO, Valdei Lopes de. Theory and History of Historiography: from the Linguistic Turn to the Ethical-Political Turn. História da Historiografia, Ouro Preto, v. 8, n. 17, p. 333–346, 2015. Available at: https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/928. Accessed in: December 8, 2016.

RESTALL, Matthew. When Montezuma Met Cortés: The True Story of the Meeting That Changed History. New York: Ecco, 2019.

RINKE, Stefan. Conquistadores y aztecas: Cortés y la conquista de México. Madrid: Editorial Edaf, 2021.

ROCA BAREA, María Elvira. Imperiofobia y Leyenda Negra. Madrid: Siruela, 2016.

ROTHERMUND, Dietmar. Introduction: Memories of Post-Imperial Nations. In: ROTHERMUND, Dietmar. Memories of Post-Imperial Nations: The Aftermath of Decolonization, 1945-2013. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. p. 12-33.

ROSSI, Juan José. Echoes of European Colonialism in South America. In: SÉBE, Berny NICOLAÏDIS, Kalypso; MAAS, Gabrielle.

Echoes of Empire: Memory, Identity and Colonial Legacies. London: IBTauris, 2015. p. 69–87.

RÜSEN, Jörn. History: Narration, Interpretation, Orientation. New York: Berghahn Books, 2005.

SALAFRANCA, Alejandro; PÉREZ VEJO, Tomás. La conquista de la identidad: México y España, 1521-1910. Madrid: Ediciones Turner, 2021.

SETH, Vanita. The Origins of Racism: A Critique of the History of Ideas. History and Theory, Oxford, v. 59, n. 3, p. 349–58, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12163. Accessed in: January 15, 2020.

STOLER, Ann Laura. Duress. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.

SOUTHGATE, Beverley. Getting Away with It: Why History Still Matters. Rethinking History, London, v. 21, n. 4, p. 489–505, 2017. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2017.1333290. Accessed in: March 13, 2020.

THOMPSON, Janna. The Apology Paradox. The Philosophical Quarterly, v. 50, n. 201, p. 470–475, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00200. Accessed in: January 15, 2021.

TOTH, Mano. The Myth of the Politics of Regret. Millennium, London, v. 43, n. 2, p. 25-56, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814555942. Accessed in: January 14, 2021.

VALENCIA MESA, David Enrique. El gobierno biopolítico de la sociedad: identidades victimizadas y movilizaciones punitivas. Co-herencia, Medellín, v. 14, n. 26, p. 87-118, 2017. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.14.26.4. Accessed in: January 14, 2021.

YACK, Bernard. Nationalism and the Moral Psychology of Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.