May we discuss open peer review in a conservative discipline?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15848/hh.v14i35.1831Keywords:
editorialDownloads
References
ARAUJO, Valdei Lopes de. Editorial: O Papel dos Periódicos na Publicação de Dados de Pesquisa. Revista Brasileira de História, São Paulo, v. 41, n. 86, p. 7-9, 2021.
BALDWIN, Melinda. Credibility, Peer Review, and Nature, 1945-1990. Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, London, v. 69, n. 3, p. 337-352, 2015.
BALDWIN, Melinda. Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of “Peer Review” in the Cold War United States. Isis, Notre Dame (US), v. 109, n. 3, p. 538-558, 2018.
CSISZAR, Alex. The Scientific Journal: authorship and the politics of knowledge in the nineteenth century. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2018.
SANTOS, Wagner Geminiano dos. A Invenção da Historiografia Brasileira Profissional, Acadêmica: geografia e memória disciplinar, disputas político-institucionais e debates epistemológicos acerca do saber histórico no Brasil (1980-2012). 2018. Tese (Doutorado em História) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em História, UFPE, Recife, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors hold the copyrights to the manuscripts submitted. História da Historiografia: International Journal for Theory and History of Historiography is authorized to publish the aforementioned text. Authors are solely responsible for data, concepts and opinions presented in the papers, along with the accuracy of document and bibliographical references.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.